本帖最後由 aboyu 於 25/3/2012 12:04 AM 編輯 Well, English writing is different from the Chinese counterpart. Usually the question is longer and contains more information which tells you what to include in the article. (I suppose it's an article, is it?) Thus it's somehow difficult to determine if the content is relevant or not, or a well-balanced structure is adopted or not. Of course I found the content relevant, though it's a bit confusing. You'd mentioned 4 (or 5, the last is hard to tell) ways to solve the problem, but the points are not very clearly presented. (I must emphasize very. I did find the points, but it's quite difficult to realize the 4th point.) I'm not sure if you have your very own structure to write an article. However, you ought to write in a way which is easy for examiners to read and follow your ideas. Well, as I read the title, I thought I encountered something similar before. So I suppose the question would require you todescribe the problem and suggest ways to solve the problem. (Did it?) If that's the case, separate the items. Anyway, it'd be better if you make a suggestion first, followed by elaboration. If you now take a close look at the 4th point, the problem exists. Mention the suggestion first (advertise the importance of communication) and then give reasons so as to support your idea (lack of communication as the fundamental concern). You know ... examiners have to mark loads of writings, and may not afford to read each writing many times to understand your idea. If you give your suggestion first at the beginning of a paragraph, the examiner (as well as you) will benefit. Errors detected/ suggestions: P2: No 'the' should be used before 'society'. (Gosh, I've made this error more than thrice since F6) P4: Be careful when you capitalize words, though you may just have typing errors. P5: Government could pay ... resort to violence. The sentence is too long. Due to the inclusion of clauses, the sentence seems clumsy and readers would lose track ... I just asked, "What's the subject?" I agree to using complex sentences, but ... well I suppose it's too much here. I suppose the title is not bad, but it's better if the title can summarize you main body - suggestions. I once used the following title for an article introducing ways to learn and use English: English Everywhere. (Then 3 methods were suggested.) So if I were you, I'd use: Domestic Violence - Ways to Tackle It. The problem is, I (or we) don't know the format of this writing: article or essay? If it's an essay, do as mentioned as in #2. If it's an article, appealing is vital. Asking questions is a way to appeal to readers. You can address to readers' possible concerns as well. If the structure is more balanced, getting a Level 4 is not that difficult. There's a lack of explanation for the 2nd method. |