香港寵物小精靈村落 論壇

 找回密碼
 加入
查看: 2511|回復: 3
打印 上一主題 下一主題

[求助] [Econ]Resources與good

[複製鏈接]
跳轉到指定樓層
1#
發表於 5/4/2009 10:26 PM | 只看該作者 回帖獎勵 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
其實我想搞清楚很久了,
究竟Resources與goods是如何區分的?
Resources的定義為Things that are required to produce goods to satisfy unlimited human wants,
當中又分為Natural resources、Man-made resources及Human resources;
Goods的定義為things(or services) that can satisfy human wants,
當中又分為Free goods及Economic goods。
那麼怎樣界定呢?
就以一個大學學位為例,
如果我們把它看作用來提供大學教育,那就是Man-made resource;
但如果我們得到一個大學學位便滿足,那就是Economic good。
但我不相信大學學位可以在兩者之間重疊,
那應該怎樣區分?
2#
發表於 5/4/2009 11:03 PM | 只看該作者
原帖由 mk311111 於 5/4/2009 10:26 PM 發表
其實我想搞清楚很久了,
究竟Resources與goods是如何區分的?
Resources的定義為Things that are required to produce goods to satisfy unlimited human wants,
當中又分為Natural resources、Man-made resources ...

Resources refer to the 4 factors of production:
Land - Natural resource
Capital - Man-made resource
Labour - Human resource
Entrepreneurship - Human resource

In your example, I can't quite agree that a university seat should be regarded as resources used to provide tertiary education service. Instead, it should represent studentship and therefore is a economic good, as more of it is preferred to less.

Examples of resources employed to provide tertiary education service include:
Professors/Teaching staff (Labour)
Administrative staff (Labour)
Campus site (Land)
Computers (Capital)
Projectors (Capital)
Desks and chairs (Capital)
etc.
回復

使用道具 舉報

3#
 樓主| 發表於 5/4/2009 11:23 PM | 只看該作者
明白了,即是這著眼點在於Produce,
是製作而非獲取吧。
多謝解答。
回復

使用道具 舉報

4#
發表於 5/4/2009 11:54 PM | 只看該作者
原帖由 mk311111 於 5/4/2009 11:23 PM 發表
明白了,即是這著眼點在於Produce,
是製作而非獲取吧。
多謝解答。

Yep, you're right.
Resources are about production while goods are about consumption.
Production and consumption are the two very important concepts in Economics!
回復

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 加入

本版積分規則

手機版|Archiver|香港寵物小精靈村落

GMT+8, 22/11/2024 03:11 PM , Processed in 0.012672 second(s), 14 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.2

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表