香港寵物小精靈村落 論壇

標題: 試下睇下以下段文字，睇你明唔明？好得意 [打印本頁]
作者: Jay~★    時間: 27/3/2004 08:52 PM
標題: 試下睇下以下段文字，睇你明唔明？好得意
Aoccdrnig to rscheearch at an Elingsh uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer is at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is
bcuseae we do not raed ervey lteter by it slef but the wrod as a wlohe.

用個腦諗下la
作者: zerox    時間: 27/3/2004 08:57 PM
so long. . .= ="""
作者: Jay~★    時間: 27/3/2004 09:00 PM
Originally posted by zerox at 2004-3-27 08:57 PM:
so long. . .= ="""

好easy嫁，我凸燈打錯好多字
作者: zerox    時間: 27/3/2004 09:03 PM
Originally posted by Jay~★ at 2004-3-27 09:00 PM:
好easy嫁，我凸燈打錯好多字

y 打錯好多字?
作者: Jay~★    時間: 27/3/2004 09:04 PM
Originally posted by zerox at 2004-3-27 09:03 PM:
y 打錯好多字?

如果打對所有字，唔係少話
作者: zerox    時間: 27/3/2004 09:10 PM
Originally posted by Jay~★ at 2004-3-27 09:04 PM:
如果打對所有字，唔係少話

. . .[E-Ah][E-Ah][E-Ah]
作者: 水龍蜥    時間: 27/3/2004 09:15 PM
一d都唔明
作者: Jay~★    時間: 27/3/2004 09:18 PM
Originally posted by 水龍蜥 at 2004-3-27 09:15 PM:
一d都唔明

嗯...
唔明唔緊要la[Em-Qu]
作者: itphone    時間: 27/3/2004 09:18 PM
我試試第一行：
Aoccdrnig(According) to rscheearch(researcher) at an Elingsh(English) uinervtisy(university), it deosn't(doesn't) mttaer(matter) in waht(what)oredr（order) the ltteers(letters) in a wrod(word)....
之後的，不試了[E-Sol]，要溫書啦[E-Ton]
作者: Jay~★    時間: 27/3/2004 09:27 PM
Originally posted by itphone at 2004-3-27 09:18 PM:
我試試第一行：
Aoccdrnig(According) to rscheearch(researcher) at an Elingsh(English) uinervtisy(university), it deosn't(doesn't) mttaer(matter) in waht(what)oredr（order) the ltteers(letters) in a ...

不如大家一人解人行好唔好?
作者: zerox    時間: 27/3/2004 09:33 PM
Tihs is
bcuseae we do not raed ervey lteter by it slef but the wrod as a wlohe.
This is
because we do not read every letter by it self but the word as a whole
作者: 莫邪    時間: 27/3/2004 11:30 PM
Originally posted by itphone at 27-3-2004 09:18 PM:
我試試第一行：
Aoccdrnig(According) to rscheearch(researcher) at an Elingsh(English) uinervtisy(university), it deosn't(doesn't) mttaer(matter) in waht(what)oredr（order) the ltteers(letters) in a ...

邊個咁得閒去作=.=
作者: Jay~★    時間: 28/3/2004 07:39 AM
Originally posted by 莫邪 at 2004-3-27 11:30 PM:
邊個咁得閒去作=.=

haha,me[E-Ton]
作者: oscar    時間: 28/3/2004 11:57 PM
Originally posted by Jay~★ at 2004-3-27 08:52 PM:
Aoccdrnig to rscheearch at an Elingsh uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer is at the rghit pclae. The rs ...

原文：
According to research at an English university, it doesn't matter in what order the letters in a word are, the only important thing is that the first and last letter is at the right place. The rest can be a total mess and you can still read it without a problem. This is because we do not read every letter by it self but the word as a whole.

中文版：
根據一間英文大學的研究，你把一個英文字任意亂排，這不是一個問題，只須首字母和尾字母是在正確位置。你可把其他字母在任何次序排列，你依然可知道那英文字是甚麼，這因為我們閱讀時不會逐個字母讀清，而會整個字讀。

我曾經都聽過，我自己都試過~很有趣的。

我也讓大家玩玩~
1. Cputoemr
2. Itrstnerenig
3. Memticahtas
4. Tnooegchly
作者: itphone    時間: 29/3/2004 12:52 PM
我也讓大家玩玩~
1. Cputoemr
2. Itrstnerenig
3. Memticahtas
4. Tnooegchly

1. Computer
2. Interesting???(多左個r[E-QuM])
3. Mathematics
4. Technology
作者: 小卡    時間: 29/3/2004 04:51 PM
太多雞腸,卡卡唔識讀....
作者: zerox    時間: 29/3/2004 05:43 PM
Originally posted by 鷹宮小卡 at 2004-3-29 04:51 PM:
太多雞腸,卡卡唔識讀....

[E-Str][E-Str]so 你叫笨笨小卡lor= =
作者: oscar    時間: 29/3/2004 09:43 PM
Originally posted by itphone at 2004-3-29 12:52:
1. Computer
2. Interesting???(多左個r[E-QuM])
3. Mathematics
4. Technology

sorry，有少少error tim...
作者: sebas    時間: 31/3/2004 11:12 PM
明~!
作者: heeroyuy    時間: 2/4/2004 01:24 PM
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: pig    時間: 2/4/2004 01:32 PM
Originally posted by heeroyuy at 2004-4-2 13:24:
咩意思呀？

唉.甘都唔识真没用枉你仲整日串我
作者: itphone    時間: 2/4/2004 01:43 PM
Originally posted by pig at 2004-4-2 01:32 PM:
唉.甘都唔识真没用枉你仲整日串我

相識的？
作者: pig    時間: 2/4/2004 01:45 PM
Originally posted by itphone at 2004-4-2 13:43:
相識的？

ＹＥＳ　ｍｙ渺小的ｃｋａｓｓｍａｔｅ
作者: 綿羊    時間: 2/4/2004 11:19 PM
看不懂[E-Gla][E-Ah]
作者: oscar    時間: 3/4/2004 12:05 AM
Originally posted by pig at 2004-4-2 13:45:
ＹＥＳ　ｍｙ渺小的ｃｋａｓｓｍａｔｅ

係classmate
作者: pig    時間: 3/4/2004 12:48 PM
Originally posted by oscar at 2004-4-3 00:05:
係classmate

O，sorry
作者: sky    時間: 6/4/2004 09:53 PM
抱歉 因為這個文章非笑話區發言權限 所以將這文搬進聊天閒聊區
作者: ansonyung    時間: 7/4/2004 08:36 PM
嗚嗚....我唔明..我好笨..............[E-Ah][E-Ah]
作者: oscar    時間: 7/4/2004 09:53 PM
我已為大家翻譯成中文，還有不明的地方嗎?
作者: Echo21    時間: 13/4/2004 11:26 AM
Originally posted by zerox at 2004-3-29 17:43:
[E-Str][E-Str]so 你叫笨笨小卡lor= =

有沒有叻叻大卡？[E-Ton]
作者: counter    時間: 16/4/2004 10:22 AM
i dont even know what you witting
作者: 霏    時間: 17/4/2004 06:42 PM
估唔到你都有睇呢單新聞，人腦係可以閱讀呢Ｄ　ｋ形文字ｇａｒ〔你老師成日都係ｌａ〕，証明人腦係依形象記憶的
作者: 小智    時間: 18/4/2004 12:26 PM
Aoccdrnig to rscheearch at an Elingsh uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer is at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is
bcuseae we do not raed ervey lteter by it slef but the wrod as a wlohe.

According to researcher(s) at an English university, it doesn't matter in what order the letters in a wordareis, the only importent thing is that the first and last letter is at the right place. The rest can be a total mess and you can still read it without a problem. This is because we do not read every letter by itself but the word as a whole.

句子有點不通順…算了
作者: 鼬    時間: 19/4/2004 09:50 PM
stye qiouyr you~
作者: 細薯    時間: 19/4/2004 10:10 PM
vrey eyas to rseliae la......jstu my oiipnon^^
作者: lilokhimivan    時間: 27/5/2004 08:19 PM
我好唔明！(我只是四年級)
作者: HIERRO    時間: 19/6/2004 10:24 AM
這篇文最主要是說大部份人其實看文字只看大概就能估到它是甚麼字或意思，所以我們在看這篇文時即使字的(中中)法有小錯誤，但我們就能估到它是甚麼字或意思的大概。
作者: snoopy11hk    時間: 19/6/2004 10:33 AM
copy it in word and check the wrong word lor~~~~~
作者: yat    時間: 19/6/2004 11:48 AM
Aoccdrnig to rscheearch at an Elingsh uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer is at the rghit pclae. The rsThe rset can be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is
bcuseae we do not raed ervey lteter by it slef but the wrod as a wlohe.
識得咁多.........
Elingsh(錯)=English
uinervtisy(錯)=unvensity(唔知o岩唔o岩)
deosn't(錯)=doesn't
mttaer(應該錯)=matter
waht(錯)=what
oredr(錯)=order
lsat(錯)=last
ltteers(錯)=letters
wrod(錯)=word
tihng(錯)=thing
ltteer(錯)=letter
rghit(錯)=right
pclae(錯)=place
rsThe(錯)=唔知
rset(錯)=rest
toatl(錯)=toatl(唔知o岩唔o岩)
sitll(錯)=still
raed(錯)=read
wouthit(錯)=without
Tihs(錯)=this
bcuseae(錯)=because
raed(錯) =read
ervey (錯)=every
lteter(錯)=letter
slef(錯)=self
wrod(錯)=word
wlohe(錯)=whole
提示：copy落word到.......會睇到晒

[ Last edited by yat on 2004-6-19 at 11:50 AM ]
作者: 西門    時間: 19/6/2004 12:42 PM
專燈打錯搞到人0地都睇唔明講什麼,還以為好得意咁.其實以上英文詞語得小部份係經常錯,其他一定係你專燈打錯,睇到我完全摸不著頭腦.[E-QuM]
作者: 霏    時間: 19/6/2004 05:31 PM
Originally posted by 西門 at 2004-6-19 12:42 PM:
專燈打錯搞到人0地都睇唔明講什麼,還以為好得意咁.其實以上英文詞語得小部份係經常錯,其他一定係你專燈打錯,睇到我完全摸不著頭腦.[E-QuM]



你唔明白佢要証明D乜－－”
呢個係要証明人腦係可以分析呢一Ｄ字而且正確辨認〔如果唔係老師睇作文會點？！〕

仲有，前面有一位仁兄串錯Ｕｎｉｖｅｒｓｉｔｙ
toatl(錯)=toatl(唔知o岩唔o岩)
係ｔｏｔａｌ



歡迎光臨 香港寵物小精靈村落 論壇 (https://proxy.archiver.hkpnve.pokebeacon.com/)Powered by Discuz! X3.2